Or, so I have been told.
Friday I was having an attitude day.  You know, one of those days when almost anything can bother you?  There I was, blowing off a little steam with a favorite website while at work.  Thanks go to my nephew, Michael, for that one.  Like I need help goofing off!  But, I digress.
I followed a link on Fark to an article.  You know, one of those Christmas/dead soldier stories.  It could have been a good sappy story for the holiday, but all I could see were two typos.  Considering this article came from a "News" agency, KUTV out of Utah, I thought it was horrific that the typos were there.  And, not one typo but two typos.  It's not a blog from a nobody, it's not an e-mail or a letter from friend to friend, it's a news report.  Call me stupid, but I think that they should be typo-free.
Did I mention that I was having a snarky day?  The guy had his e-mail address as part of his article, so I took advantage of it.  Here is my e-mail to him, in its entirety less our names:
Mr. XXX: 
After reading your article, only one thing remains in my mind.  You really need to hire a proof reader.
I thought I was being as nice as I could be, letting him know that he screwed up without telling him in a way that I really wanted to use!  Here was his response, again in its entirety, less our names:
Ms. YYY
Thank you for the message and for pointing out the two grammatical errors contained within the copy.
Next time, however, I hope you will use more tact with your criticism.
XXX, KUTV.com
I was going to link his article to this blog, but I just went and reread his article and he FIXED the typos.  There went my fun.  Since he said I was tactless, I am not giving him any publicity here.
As a side note, anyone that knows me, knows my e-mail to him WAS tactful.  He should have seen the first five drafts of the e-mail.  Good thing I proof read before I hit the send button, not only for typos but for decorum as well.  Yeah, buddy.  This was the cleaned up version.
No comments:
Post a Comment